Posts Tagged do not like

My reading habits

I’ve noticed some odd changes in my reading habits as I get older. Namely my attention span seems to be slowly slipping towards what I like to characterise as “manic guinea pig” levels. I love the physicality and heft of large, thick books but I find myself approaching their reading with a sinking heart – it’s difficult to keep myself patient for the time it takes to read them. I think that’s why my recent reading run has been so successful – several shorter books (though I did manage Wolf Hall and that’s no shrinking violet in the length stakes). On the other hand though, I don’t want to be stuck reading shorter books forever, I vastly admire any author who can sustain their creations for truly long books, and I don’t want to deny myself the pleasure of being immersed in those creations.

I’m hoping to some extent this is a phase rather than a long-term change! My reading style seems to go through cycles. Up until quite recently I was always loathe not to finish a book I had started, out of some sort of need to prove my stick-to-it-ness. These days, though, I am far less patient with books that are not keeping my interest or proving worth my reading time – and oftentimes it’s hard to put my finger on exactly what it is that is making it unreadworthy. Sometimes even bad or badly-written books can be readworthy, with a judicious amount of skim-reading.

Perhaps it’s just as time goes on and I think about the amount of great books out there yet to be read and the amount of great books to come I see less use in wasting my time on those that are falling well outside that category.

Question and Comment Time: So, dear viewers of mine, have your reading habits changed over the years? Can you give a book up or are you readers to the end? Do you have to read only shorter books or longer books and do you mind?

Tags: , , ,

The funny version of those “..of the Decade” lists

This Worst Books of the Decade blog from Guardian.co.uk made me titter.

Especially the bits about On Chesil Beach by Ian McEwan, because now I know I’m not alone.

Make sure you read the comments…my favourite is from PatrickRiot “Ever notice Dan Brown is the special needs Umberto Eco?” - ouch!

Tags: , , ,

BookieMonster’s What Not to Do With Books

As part of our business we spend a lot of time going through secondhand books and some of the things we find get me pondering, snickering and sometimes, a little annoyed. So here is a small list of suggestions of what not to do with your books…

  1. Names in books. Please, please, please if you’re selling or giving away a secondhand book don’t twink, black out or cut out a name that’s been written in the book. All you will do is make the book uglier and if you just leave your name there, I can say with a high level of confidence that you will NOT be stalked by subsequent purchasers. Even if you have at some point written your phone number on the first page, it is very unlikely that you will recieve a call at 2am asking for your opinion on whodunnit or complaining the book is no good. Trust me. Think of it as your little contribution to the book community, your own personal Golden Record.
  2. Dropping books in the bath. Every so often we receive books that have slightly ruffly pages, like paper that has been damp then dried. What’s happened to these books I wonder? Bath dropping? Puddle dropping? Children? It’s a mystery. Books and water – not a mix.
  3. Bookmarks. It’s amazing what people use as bookmarks. I have a small box filled with these finds, ranging from the mundane (business cards, boarding passes) to the personal (letters and family photos) to the “Previous owner should have REALLY checked this” ($20 note, photo of woman on a bed wearing only lingerie and a feather boa). And just recently I found my first CD in a book. It’s not part of the book and not supposed to be there. I just need a working CD drive to find out what’s on it (because I’m nosy alright?)! My advice – give your books a quick flick before you part with them. And lucky for you, if you buy a book from BookieMonster we’ll chuck in an extra special superdooper totally 100% free change your life BookieMonster bookmark. Phwoar, free stuff!
  4. Books as coasters. You have a mug of hot tea or coffee. Suddenly you have a task that requires two hands. But what to do with the mug? Where could you possible put it? On top of your book of course! Solve your mug problem and add an attractive brown ring to your book’s cover at the same time. Brilliant!

So what do you wish people wouldn’t do to books? What bookie habits make you cringe?

Tags: , ,

A new small entry to BookieMonster’s List of Do Not Likes

Sadly I have added a new entry to BookieMonster’s list of Do Not Likes. And I say “sadly” because I am genuinely sad about this one, I wanted to like it, I was really excited about finding a copy to read but when I read it I found myself increasingly confused and feeling a growing sense of loathing.

“It” is On Chesil Beach by Ian McEwan. Now I want to be an Ian McEwan fan. It seems from my other Likes that I should be the ideal Ian McEwan fan. I mean, I genuinely enjoy Booker Prize-winning books (odd, I know), I tend towards UK writers and I may be a tiny little literary snob. But other than Amsterdam (which I read a long time ago and can’t remember disliking) I just haven’t liked any of his books.

On Chesil Beach is the story of the wedding night of Florence and Edward, married that day, virgins still and anticipating their wedding night, though for completely different reasons. I can admire the technical virtuosity of the writing in On Chesil Beach but I could not forgive the absolute drivel of a plot and frankly ridiculous characterisations.

I felt no emotional connection with either Edward or Florence. Edward is made out to be an almost dribbling with desire teenage boy (he’s 23) and Florence is a bad stereotype of a frigid Victorian wife. The time of the novel felt completely wrong – this is the 1960s? I don’t have personal experience of 1960’s England, but for the first 10 pages or so I thought we were in 1920’s England instead. By the time we got to the night’s “climax” (arf arf) the whole thing just seemed ridiculous. I was so lost by that point that the further relationship “flashbacks” and denouement of the night held no interest. The last 5 pages of the book then rush through the next 40 years of the characters’ lives, ending on a sort of confused “Wish we hadn’t done that” tone.

Fortunately, it was short and only took me about an hour to get through – I’m not the world’s fastest reader, but skim-reading much of it was more than enough for me.

I like interior dialogues and character driven stories, I like superb writing that exposes the little lies we tell to ourselves and others, I like deeply moving novels exploring what it means to try (and often fail) to communicate with another person, especially if you love that person. For me, this book was none of those.

I am resigned to my fate of not being a McEwan fan.

Tags: , , , , ,

BookieMonster’s List of Do Not Likes

I had a read back through some of my previous posts and thought so far I’ve blogged a lot about what I like and reviewed books that I have enjoyed, but haven’t said a lot about what I don’t like when it comes to books. So I thought I’d bring you BookieMonster’s List of Do Not Like’s. In advance I’d like to say I’m sorry if my opinions differ from your own!

  1. Harry Potter

    I never got Harry Potter. I read at least 2 of the books (they made such an impression I can’t even remember if I got to the 3rd book or not). “Okaayyyy” I thought.
    I saw the first movie. “Snooooore” I thought.
    I just couldn’t get passionate about Harry. I never felt entirely transported by the books and they never made me think. Great books for younger kids to get interested in reading (if they like them), but not sure what they were supposed to do for adults. And the movies are total pants.
    Sorry!

  2. Lord of the Rings

    lord of the snoresAs a New Zealander it is almost sacrilege to disparage Lord of the Rings so straight off I should make clear that I totally love Peter Jackson’s movies. So much so that for a brief second I even considered trying (for the fourth time) to read the books.
    A very brief second.
    The furtherest I’ve ever gotten into the books is about a quarter into Fellowship of the Ring. By this stage the feeling that Tolkien was just coming up with proper names and place names by throwing cards with random syllables up into the air and seeing how they came down, was so strong it was almost inducing hysteria every time I came up against another Galadalbombadelliandodrolsnaketonguerial.
    Sorry!

  3. Dan Brown

    I had a work colleague who everytime you asked her what she was reading she would say “The Da Vinci Code” with an ever increasing air of desperation. This went on for about 6 months. So, no.
    Sorry!

I’m going to stop now that I’ve offended 3 segments of the market.  Further segments will have to wait for future blog posts.

Remember, just because we don’t share opinions doesn’t mean we can’t share book trades!

:)

P.S. I know, the title’s terrible. My imagination clearly took a brief nap.

Tags: , ,

© 2009-2010 BookieMonster All Rights Reserved