Posts Tagged mystery fiction

What’s BookieMonster Reading? The Unburied by Charles Palliser

What an odd little book. I’ve read Quincunx by the same author, and that is an odd large book. So the word I guess I’m best associating with Palliser at the moment is “odd”. And I’ll add “skilful” because there is no denying that his writing is obviously accomplished. Ostensibly a murder mystery (both present [as in the book’s present] and historical) this is more of a psychological mystery – the complex and intricate plotting of the whodunnit matched by the complex and intricate detailing of the mind of the narrator, Dr Courtine.

The story is set in Victorian times in a cathedral town, amongst the various denizens associated with the cathedral and, as said, is narrated by Dr Courtine – a history professor visiting an old friend and nursing an old grievance. There is much here about historical manuscripts, academic intrigue and theological debate as well as personal demons.

This reminded me on more than one occasion of Umberto Eco’s The Name of the Rose (which I love), though the labyrinthine turnings of the whodunnit plot did threaten to overwhelm me every so often – I have to admit my attention span is not what it once was (I blame the interwebs). The characters themselves are intriguing, especially the little psychological revelations and the “secrets and lies” tone, but ultimately completely unlikeable.

All in all, a good read and one I’d recommend to Victorian mystery buffs especially (and even more especially those with good concentration skills and long attention spans), but not one I felt particularly connected to on an emotional level.

2 ½ little black furry BookieMonster Kitteh paws up. Or 3. Argh. I’m on holiday, I’ve no decision-making skills. ;)

Tags: , , , ,

What’s BookieMonster Reading? The Little Stranger by Sarah Waters

The Little Stranger

Creepy. Unsettling. Strange (not surprisingly). I’m left a bit confused as to how to explain The Little Stranger. This is a superbly written book suffering from a slight defect in urgency – though whether this is in fact a deficit is debatable – this tale takes its time and has a slow pace in the beginning, which gradually becomes more obviously well-suited to the story, but in the first third of the book there is a danger of falling into a torpor.

The Little Stranger is set in an upper class but rapidly decaying home – Hundreds Hall – following WW2, and the story is told by Dr Faraday – a local “lad made good” who remembers visiting Hundreds as a child and whose mother worked there as a nursery maid. Gradually it becomes clear that all is not well at Hundreds Hall, inhabited only by Mrs Ayres and her son Roderick and daughter Caroline, and a young teenage maid, with strange happenings seeming to indicate a malevolent force at work.

There are larger issues here, playing out within a domestic setting – the loss of wealth and status and the general aimlessness of the upper classes after WW2. Roderick, injured in the service of the country, has little to do but obsess over the state of his “estate” – and littler money to do it with. Caroline is a spinster, almost nostalgic for the war that gave her life a purpose and meaning beyond marriage.

Waters’ amazing technique with writing is on total show here – her ability to inhabit the voices of her characters is skilful and as equally creepy as the events they contend with. There is no jarring note here, no moment of anachronism. Their voices are fully formed and genuine and one feels total submersion in the time and story of the novel. Haunting and haunted, the voices of ghosts and a time past. Perfect for the tale being told.

The unsettled atmosphere increases as the story moves on, gradually drawing you in and eventually becoming gripping, with moments of genuine spookiness. Waters holds back from explanation and outright description though, intensifying the creepiness by lack of detail about what exactly we are dealing with here. The reader is never allowed a complete grip on events, an ambiguity that is slightly maddening but also means we never stray into well-worn territory of “horror”.

Who is The Little Stranger, is it really a ghost or is it the character of Dr Faraday himself? In the end it’s almost as if the only person who doesn’t want to give up the “gentrified” Hundreds Hall is the one person who also resents its presence – Faraday. There is a love story here, ostensibly between Faraday and Caroline – but in the end I was left wondering if Faraday’s true love is not in fact Hundreds itself, rather than any of its inhabitants.

Which, I think, is exactly where Waters wanted me, as a reader, to be.

3 little furry black BookieMonster Kitteh paws up. I didn’t find this as completely satisfying as other Waters’ books (notably Fingersmith and Affinity), but its patient skill cannot be overlooked.

Tags: , , , , ,

What’s BookieMonster reading? The Brimstone Wedding by Barbara Vine

The Brimstone Wedding

The Brimstone Wedding

As you know, I had a fantastic introduction to Barbara Vine via The Chimney Sweeper’s Boy.  So I picked up a couple of secondhand copies of further Vine titles in the hope the honeymoon would continue.

Hooray, it did! The Brimstone Wedding has the same precise, spare, but perfectly tailored writing as The Chimney Sweeper’s Boy and has an even better sense of foreboding and tension. And there’s a “plus” – it doesn’t suffer the let-down (or lack of suspense) in the climax that I found with The Chimney Sweeper’s Boy. The conclusion in The Brimstone Wedding was a genuine shock.

A short plot summary : Genevieve looks after Stella Newland in a private rest home. Stella is dying of lung cancer and she and Genevieve share secrets of infidelities – Stella eventually reveals all about her past.

Ack. Can you tell I hate giving plot summaries? I want to talk about the writing. The Brimstone Wedding is about secrets, about love and about how love can make you behave in inhuman ways towards others. It’s more plot-driven then The Chimney Sweeper’s Boy but has the definite advantage of more likeable characters – not a necessity but you realise the greater pleasure in reading likeable characters – not loveable, but more rounded and more human. Vine’s “thrillers” are genuine thrillers in a domestic and character-driven sense. And her craft is unmistakeable.

As with The Chimney Sweeper’s Boy it would be easy to overlook her writing – it’s not intrusive but on further examination you realise just how good it is. Every word seems perfectly choosen, nothing is out of place and nothing jars. I am in awe.

3 out of 4 little black BookieMonster Kitteh paws up. A highly recommended read!

Now to ferrret out more Vine…

Tags: , , ,

What’s BookieMonster Reading?: The Chimney Sweeper’s Boy by Barbara Vine

How can someone write so well? Vine has that amazing knack of making her writing seem totally effortless, even while you know there must be a huge amount of effort going into it.

Gerald Candless is a writer – a popular, but literary writer (it was kind of teehee the way Vine emphasised this point several times) who dies suddenly of a heart attack. His publisher asks one of his daughters to write a “memoir” of his life and she discovers he was not who he said he was. And it continues from there (ack, can you tell I hate plot summaries).

To begin with an understatement, these are not nice people. To be crass and colloquial about it, Gerald Candless and his two adoring daughters are total dicks. You know those people who manage to combine being utterly self-absorbed with being completely devoid of self-awareness or insight into their own motivations and actions? These are those people.

Vine’s writing is so good that fortunately you manage to see past their dickishness and into what is an intriguing story – one with a few twists and also unseen (by the main characters) coincidences as well as moments where the wilful non-communication by these people means they remain in the dark about many things (fortunately we as readers don’t). Plus the subplot about Ursula, Candless’ wife and the mother of his two daughters, is sweet and touching and also a nice counterpoint.

The publisher’s blurb about the book characterises it as a psychological thriller, but that makes it sound far more plot-driven than it is – this is a book about people, what makes them do the things they do and what makes them be the way they are. There is no real sense of suspense here (or at least there wasn’t for me, because Gerald’s “secret” is pretty much obvious from the first page), and the ending revelation is more “oh, ok” than “No. No. That’s not true. That’s impossible!“.

But the writing, oh the writing. It’s just so good you’ll keep reading and reading and reading every page and hating the characters and reading.

3 out of 4 little black BookieMonster Kitteh paws up.

Tags: , , ,

NZ Book Month: In My Father’s Den by Maurice Gee

What’s BookieMonster currently reading? In My Father’s Den by Maurice Gee

NZ Book Month ChallengeAs part of New Zealand Book Month (being October – I’d like to think they choose it because it’s my birthday month, but I have a feeling this is not, in fact, the case), and just add books’ NZ Book Month Challenge, I decided to read a few New Zealand authors (not that I need an excuse to read NZ authors, but it helps me make a decision about what I’m going to read next if I have some reasoning). First up was In My Father’s Den by Maurice Gee.

Ostensibly In My Father’s Den is a who-dunnit – a murder mystery that begins with the discovery of the body of Celia Inverarity, which quickly leads police to Paul Prior (the narrator of the book) who is the last person to see Celia alive, and who is also her English teacher as well as the jilted teenage boyfriend of her mother, Joyce (jilted in favour of Celia’s father, Charlie). This basic plotline frames the central, bigger part of the book, the story of men – three men in particular, Paul, his father and his brother Andrew – and the ways they hide from and cope with what their lives have been and become, and particularly the effects of the women in their lives.

The story is set in Wadesville – a not very thinly disguised version of Henderson, Auckland. One criticism I have of the book is this conceit – why the made up setting when it’s so clearly based on a real setting? Just use reality! Maybe in 1972 NZ (when the book was published) the publishers were afraid of using real New Zealand places for stories such as this – which is a shame because the setting is such an integral part of the story that the made-up version is a distraction when it could (and should) have been seamless.

My only other criticism really isn’t a criticism of this book – but I desperately wanted more of Celia. That, however, is really a whole ‘nother book, and potentially an extremely interesting one! But without more the few hints and brief glimpses into her life we have don’t quite ring true or authentic – she isn’t fleshy enough to stand as a whole character, but only as an idea. This tempts me to employ my Arts student cod-post-structuralism and wonder about the attitude towards the women in the book – the way their stories are essentially shut down and retreated from by the men and the tone of fear and mild distaste surrounding the female characters. This isn’t a criticism though – this adds to the depth of thought and feeling that this title evokes in the reader.

In My Father's Den

In My Father's Den

In My Father’s Den is, in many ways, the archetypal dark, mysterious New Zealand story. Somewhere in our psyche is this fear of ourselves, our land, our remoteness and the stories of all the people missing or lost that we carry. I always get a sense of black enjoyment to see this explored in books.

Three furry black paws from BookieMonster Kitteh.

Tags: , , , ,

© 2009-2010 BookieMonster All Rights Reserved